Crossboundary medical care: The example of Type 2 Diabetics in Germany and France, in need of treatment in the neighboring country

Abdelhaq Bahjaj, Heinrich Krayl, Thomas Wetter

Abstract


Introduction and problem: In times of European integration and aging societies it becomes more important that citizens with medical conditions receive continuity or care when treated abroad. We use the old time European allies Germany and France and the complex and highly prevalent condition Diabetes Mellitus to investigate the smoothness of the transition when patients cross borders.

Material and methods: We reviewed the recommendations of WHO and legal documents in the European Union and the two countries regarding what rights citizens have. We selected one well renowned hospital each. There we followed quasi random samples of 33 resp 34 local patients. Of these patients we studied in full and compared the documents used for the visit. This included percentage of pertinent parameters noted or not noted, units and normal ranges applied and several more. We also assembled a list of available standards for documentation and to what extent they were used and addressed the basic question of trustworthy translation between the two speciality languages.

Results: While legislation gives the patient a far ranging right to treatment abroad, practice shows notable and partially alarming differences. Different professional groups perform different tasks; outpatient and inpatient treatment are differently organized giving patients different roles than at home; completeness of documentation varies by a factor of more than two for core parameters; differences in physical unions and the absence of units in French records bearsevere risks; some standards are used differently and standards in general are used much less than appropriate.

Discussion: Although limited in scope the study demonstrates that Sunday speeches about open borders in the EU have a blind eye on health practice. Inertia hampers the potential of standards to be used for all structured data and we are barely touching upon the multiple languages problem for necessarily narrative parts.


Keywords


Type 2 diabetes mellitus; medical records; inpatient and outpatient discharge letters; national and European laws; international standards in medicine; medical informatics; linguistics; translation science; France; Germany

Full Text:

PDF

References


Council of the European Communities, Commission of the European Communities. Treaty on European Union. Maastricht on 7 February 1992. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 1992. Brussels – Luxembourg, 1992.

European Union 2017. The European story. 60 years of shared progress, 1 March 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/epsc/sites/epsc/files/the-european-story_epsc.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

European Union (Website) – The history of the European Union. https://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/history_en#1945-1959. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Treaty of Amsterdam amending the Treaty on European Union, the Treaties establishing the European Communities and certain related Acts. Amsterdam on 2 October 1997. European Communities, 1997. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/treaty/pdf/amst-en.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Worldatlas. Which Countries Border Germany?. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/what-countries-border-germany.html. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Busse R., Blüme M. Health System in Transition. Vol. 16 No. 2 2014. Germany system review. European Observatory on heath System and Policies. 2014. https://www.mig.tu-berlin.de/fileadmin/a38331600/2011.lectures/HiT-Germany_2014.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

IDF 2015 – International Diabetes Federation – Diabetes Atlas seventh edition 2015. International Diabetes Federation. https://www.idf.org/e-library/epidemiology-research/diabetes-atlas.html. Accessed February 03, 2019.

IDF 2017a – International Diabetes Federation. https://www.idf.org/our-network/regions-members/europe/members/134-france.html. Accessed February 03, 2019.

IDF 2017b – International Diabetes Federation. https://www.idf.org/our-network/regions-members/europe/members/136-germany.html. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Inserem – Institut national de santé et de la recherche médicale. https://www.inserm.fr/information-en-sante/dossiers-information/diabete-type-2. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Jacob Louis, von Vultee Christian, Kostev Karel. Prescription Patterns and the Cost of Antihyperglycemic Drugs in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Germany. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5375068/. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Working Group Epidemiology of the German Diabetes Society: Stellungnahme der AG Epidemiologie der Deutschen Diabetes-Gesellschaft zum IDF Diabetes Atlas: Wie häufig ist Typ 2 – Diabetes in Deutschland? (missing publication year). https://www.deutsche-diabetes-gesellschaft.de/fileadmin/Redakteur/Stellungnahmen/Stellungnahme_AG_EPI_310511.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Waldeyer R, Brinks R, Rathmann W, Giani G, Icks A. Projection of the burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Germany: a demographic modelling approach to estimate the direct medical excess costs from 2010 to 2040. PubMed 2013. 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23506452. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Charbonnel B, Simon D, Dallogeville J, et al. Direct Medical Costs of Type 2 Diabetes in France: An Insurance Claims Database Analysis. Published online 2017 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0050-3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5972121/. Accessed February 03, 2019.

World Health Organisation (WHO) - International dollar and ppp. https://www.who.int/choice/costs/ppp/en/. Accessed February 03, 2019.

IDF 2006 – International Diabetes Federation. The IDF Consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. 2006. International Diabetes Federation. Accessed February 03, 2019.

European Union – website : Regulations. https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en. Accessed February 03, 2019.

European Union – website : Directive. https://europa.eu/european-union/eu-law/legal-acts_en. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and for Switzerland). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004R0883&from=EN. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems (Text with relevance for the EEA and. for the EEA and for Switzerland). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009R0987&from=en. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2011:088:0045:0065:en:PDF. Accessed February 03, 2019.

OECD 2013 - Strengthening health information infrastructure for health care quality governance. Good practices, new opportunities and data privacy protection challenges. Preliminary Version. 1 april 2013. http://www.oecd.org/els/health-systems/Strengthening-Health-Information-Infrastructure_Preliminary-version_2April2013.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Directive 2005/36/EC oft he European Parlament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005L0036&from=EN. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Holzmann R., Fuchs M., Elitok Paçacı S., and Dale P.: Assessing Benefit Portability for International Migrant Workers: A review of the Germany-Turkey bilateral social security agreement. May 2016. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/699301467993491941/pdf/106233-WP-ADD-SERIES-PUBLIC-Migrant-workers-Germany-Turkey.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

WHO 2012. Global Observatory for eHealth series – Volume 6. Management of patient information. Trends and challenges in Member States. 2012. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/76794/1/9789241504645_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 03, 2019.

WHO 2016a. Patient Engagement, Technical Series on Safer Primary Care. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252269/9789241511629-eng.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed February 03, 2019.

WHO 2016b. Global Observatory for eHealth. Global diffusion of eHealth: Making universal health coverage achievable. Report of the third global survey on eHealth. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/252529/9789241511780-eng.pdf;jsessionid=FE964F45DA64A73ABBEA5F3AA786A4A6?sequence=1. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Galtier F, et al. Clinical Consequences of Metformin-Associated Vitamin B12 Deficiency Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, 2017. https://www.jscimedcentral.com/NutritionalDisorders/nutritionaldisorders-1-1002.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Marar O, et al. The prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on metformin, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland Student Medical Journal; 4(1): 16-20. 2011. http://www.rcsismj.com/wp-content/uploads/RCSIsmj-Vol4-OA-B12-DMT2.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Pickett D. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Countries Using ICD-10 For Reimbursement or Case Mix. (missing year of publication). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Contracting/ContractorLearningResources/downloads/ICD-10_Overview_Presentation.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

WHO-ICD-10 Version 2016: Diabetes mellitus (E10-E14). http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en#/E10-E14. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Heinemann L, Freckmann G. Quality of HbA1c Measurement in the Practice: The German Perspective. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 2015, Vol. 9(3) 687–695. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604529/pdf/10.1177_1932296815572254.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Kilpatrick E. HbA1c measurement. J Clin Pathol 2004; 57:344–345. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2003.010918. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1770259/. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Bruce C. Anthropometric Indicators Measurement Guid. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance. 2001. ftp://ftp.ufv.br/dns/sylvia/anthro.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Soni A, Verma V. Anthropometric Indicators of Obesity and Percent Body Fat – A Measure for Weight Management. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1a5a/bb3244598460652e45dd01f2138c8b2495ee.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Salehidoost R, Mansouri A, Amini M, Yamini S, Aminorroaya A. Body mass index and the all-cause mortality rate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, 2018. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29546575. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Kostev K, Raathmann W.: Influence of macro- and microvascular comorbidity on time to insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes patients: a retrospective database analysis in Germany, France, and UK. 2013 Jul;7(2):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23478140. Accessed March 02, 2019.

Eurostat. Tourism statistics. Pocketbooks. Population and social conditions – Industry, trade and services. 2007 edition. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3930297/5958906/KS-DS-07-001-EN.PDF/b5339dcf-93b4-4cf9-acfb-acc643b6da65?version=1.0. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Lehnbom Elin C, Raban Magdalena Z, Walter Scott R, Richardson K, Westbrook Johanna I. Do electronic discharge summaries contain more complete medication information? A retrospective analysis of paper versus electronic discharge summaries. Health Information Management Journal. Volume 43 Issue 3; 2014. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/183335831404300301. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Dick RS, Steen EB, Detmer, DE(. The Computer-Based Patient Record. An Essential Technology for Health Care. Committee on Improving the patient record. Division of health care services. Institute of Medicine. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1997.

European Commission 2014. Digital Single Market. Projects story7 July 2014. Cross-border health project epSOS: What has it achieved?. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/cross-border-health-project-epsos-what-has-it-achieved. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Moharra Montse, Almazán Cari, Decool Marie, Nilsoson Anna-Lena, Allegretti Natalia, Sven Merik. Implementation of a cross-border health service: physician and pharmacists’ opinions from the epSOS project. Family Practice, Volume 32. Issue 5, 1 October 2015, Pages 564–567. https://academic.oup.com/fampra/article/32/5/564/690255. Accessed February 03, 2019.

TrEHRT: What is Travelers Electronic Health Record Template (TrEHRT)?. Available at: http://www.trehrt.com/. Accessed June 24, 2016.

Li YC, Haux R, et al. A global travelers’ electronic health record template standard for personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012;19:134e136. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000323. http://jamia.oxfordjournals.org/content/jaminfo/19/1/134.full.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31995L0046&from=en. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Ogden CK, Richards IA. The meaning of meaning. The eighth Edition 1946. http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/pdfs/ogden-richards-meaning-all.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

DiMarco C, Hirst G, Stede M. The semantic and stylistic differentiation of synonyms and near-synonyms. 1993. https://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1993/SS-93-02/SS93-02-025.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Edmonds P. Translating near-synonyms: Possibilities and preferences in the interlingua. In Proceedings of the AMTA/SIG-IL Second Workshop on Interlinguas, Langhorne, PA, October 1998, pp. 23-30. http://ftp.cs.toronto.edu/pub/gh/Edmonds-98.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Doug A, et al. Machine translation. An Introduction Guide. Chapter 6. Translation problems. 2008. https://www1.essex.ac.uk/linguistics/external/clmt/MTbook/PostScript/ch6.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Heylen K, Steurs F. Translating legal and administrative language: How to deal with legal terms and their flexible meaning potential, 2014. http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.be/qlvl/prints/Heylen_Steurs_2014draft_Translating_Legal_Administrative_Language.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Trossel MV. The Current Problems of Compiling Translation – Orientated Terminological Dictionaries. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences 8 (2015 8) 1762-1768. http://elib.sfu-kras.ru/bitstream/handle/2311/19742/23_Trossel.pdf;jsessionid=B79F42CECEF746B94155DA3EF7BD19C8?sequence=1. Accessed February 03, 2019.

Uban AS. Hard Synonymy and Applications in Automatic Detection of Synonyms and Machine Translation, 2016. 2016. https://comparable.limsi.fr/bucc2016/pdf/BUCC07.pdf. Accessed February 03, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18103/imr.v5i4.815

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.