Simulation-based Procedural Skill Training

Taylor Sawyer, Megan R Gray

Abstract


Procedures are a critical part of medical practice.  In this report, we examine the topic of simulation-based procedural skill training. Developing competency with procedures begins in medical school and continues through residency training. After residency training, internists must maintain competency in a defined set of required procedures. Simulation plays a key role in all these stages. Learning procedural skills is influenced by an individual’s ability, skill, and set.  Competency in procedural skills develops through a series of five stages spanning from novice to expert. The Halstedian training model of ‘see one, do one, teach one’ has been replaced by a contemporary model of procedural skill training that uses simulation. The contemporary training model consisting of six stages: Learn, See, Practice, Prove, Do, and Maintain. While simulation-based procedural skill training can be applied to both graduate and continuing medical education in internal medicine, it should always be seen as a supplement to performing procedures in the clinical environment, not as a replacement


Keywords


: simulation, training, procedural skills, procedural training, internal medicine

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Board of Internal Medicine. Policies and Procedures for Certification. Philadelphia, PA. American Board of Internal Medicine; 2018:2-4

Jackson WD, Diamond MR Jackson DJ. Procedural medicine. Is your number up? Australian Family Physician. 1993;22(9):1633-6.

Moazed F, Cohen ER, Furiasse N, et al. Retention of Critical Care Skills after Simulation-Based Mastery Learning. JGME. 2013;5(3):458-463.

Sawyer T, White M, Zaveri P, Chang T, Ades A, French H, et al. Learn, see, practice, prove, do, maintain: an evidence-based pedagogical framework for procedural skill training in medicine. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1025-1033.

Singer RN. The psychomotor domain: movement behaviors. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febigor;1972:385-414.

Harrow AJ. A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain. New York, NY: David McKay; 1972:14-31.

Fleishman EA. The structure and measure of physical fitness. Oxford, England: Prentice Hall; 1964.

Simpson, E. The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain: The psychomotor domain. Vol. 3. Washington, DC: Gryphon House; 1972

Dreyfus S, Dreyfus H. A five-stage model of the mental activities involved in directed skill acquisition. Published February 1980. http://www.dtic.mil/cgibin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADA084551. Accessed August 4, 2018.

Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Application of see one, do one, teach one concept in surgical training. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(5):1194-1201.

Lenchus JD. End of the "see one, do one, teach one" era: the next generation of invasive bedside procedural instruction. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010;110(6):340-346.

Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):783-788.

Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978-988.

McGaghie WC, Draycott TJ, Dunn WF, Lopez CM, Stefanidis D. Evaluating the impact of simulation on translational patient outcomes. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:S42-47.

McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Ed. 2010;44(1):50-63.

Ross JG. Simulation and psychomotor skill acquisition: A review of the literature. Clin Simul Nurs. 2012;8(1):341-349.

Schaefer JJ, Vanderbilt AA, Cason CL, Bauman EB, Glavin RJ, Lee FW, et al. Literature review: Instructional design and pedagogy science in healthcare simulation. Simul Healthc. 2011;6:S30-41.

Scholtz AK, Monachino AM, Nishisaki A, Nadkarni VM, Lengetti E. Central venous catheter dress rehearsals: translating simulation training to patient care and outcomes. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(5):341-349.

Zendejas B, Brydges R, Wang AT, Cook DA. Patient outcomes in simulation-based medical education: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med 2013;28(8):1078-1089.

Philiber I, eds. ACGME Bulletin. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Available from: https://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PFAssets/bulletin/bulletin12_05.pdf. Accessed August 4, 2018

Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 Suppl):S70-81.

McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Medical education featuring mastery learning with deliberate practice can lead to better health for individuals and populations. Acad Med. 2011;86(11):e8-9.

Rethans JJ, Norcini JJ, Baron-Maldonado M, Blackmore D, Jolly BC, LaDuca T, et al. The relationship between competence and performance: implications for assessing practice performance. Med Ed. 2002;36(10):901-909.

Sawyer T, Gray MM. Procedural training and assessment of competency utilizing simulation. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40(7):438-446.

Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Moazed F, Caprio T, Didwania A, McGaghie WC, et al. Making July safer: simulation-based mastery learning during intern boot camp. Acad Med. 2013;88(2):233-239.

Lucas BP, Tierney DM, Jensen TP, Dancel R, Cho J, El-Barbary M, et al. Credentialing of hospitalists in ultrasound-guided bedside procedures: a position statement of the society of hospital medicine. J Hosp. Med 2018;2;126-135.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18103/imr.v4i9.760

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.