Overview of metal-on-metal hip joint replacements, recognizing the signs and symptoms of failure

Alexander Rahill

Abstract


Metal-on-metal total hip replacement and metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implants came into the orthopaedic zeitgeist in the early 2000s, reaching their peak usage around 2006 (1). Metal-on-metal hip joint replacements were designed to be more durable to withstand the rigors of younger patients. Unfortunately, by 2006 the promising initial data regarding metal-on-metal hip joint replacements was engulfed by figures reporting increased rates of joint revision (1). This revision data led to product recalls and a move away from using metal-on-metal implants in total hip replacements and hip resurfacing operations. Nevertheless, many patients still have these components in-situ, which makes it important for physicians to understand the background of metal-on-metal components, how they fail and what investigations should be arranged in order to recognize component failure as early as possible.

 

One of the most dependent factors for the failure of metal-on-metal hip joint replacements is inflammatory pseudotumour, which develop more frequently around metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty components, compared to metal-on-polyethylene components. The development of pseudotumours is thought to be the nidus for metal-on-metal implant failure, because the pseudotumour destroys the soft tissue, which is in turn thought to lead to aseptic loosening and, increased wear rates on the articulating components. 70% of patients who develop a pseudotumour will require a hip joint arthroplasty revision operation (2, 3). Recognizing impending implant failure early reduces the soft tissue destruction around the implant, and makes revision of the total hip replacement, if required, technically easier to perform and more likely to be successful. Where a physician suspect’s metal-on-metal total hip replacement failure, we recommend physicians order serum cobalt concentration level tests, a plain X-Ray and a CT of the local area, looking for signs of implant failure. If signs are found, the patient should be referred back to their orthopaedic surgeon for further opinion and management. 


Keywords


Metal-on-metal, hip joint replacement,

Full Text:

PDF

References


Registry AOANJR. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2016. Adelaide: AOA. Adelaide, Australia: Australian Orthopaedic Association; 2016.

Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Gundle R, McLardy-Smith P, Beard DJ, et al. Hip resurfacings revised for inflammatory pseudotumour have a poor outcome. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2009;91(8):1019-24.

Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL, et al. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2008;90(7):847-51.

National Joint Registry of England W, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. 12th Annual Report. Annual report. 2015 December 2014.

Register SHA. The Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register Annual report 2014. 2015. Report No.: 978-91-980507-6-9.

Meier B. J.&J. in Deal to Settle Hip Implant Lawsuits. The New York Times. 2013 November 20.

Stanford v DePuy International Ltd (No 6) FCA 1452., (2016).

Treacy RB, McBryde CW, Pynsent PB. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume. 2005;87(2)(0301-620X):167-70.

Registry AOANJR. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report 2015. 2015.

Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW, National Joint Registry of E, et al. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet. 2012;379(9822):1199-204.

Bozic KJ, Kurtz S Fau - Lau E, Lau E Fau - Ong K, Ong K Fau - Chiu V, Chiu V Fau - Vail TP, Vail Tp Fau - Rubash HE, et al. The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;9(7)(1535-1386 (Electronic)):1614-20.

Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: The influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B. 2011;93(2):164-71.

Desloges W, Catelas I, Nishiwaki T, Kim PR, Beaule PE. Do revised hip resurfacing arthroplasties lead to outcomes comparable to those of primary and revised total hip arthroplasties? Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2012;470(11):3134-41.

Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC. Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2007;89(4):735-41.

Fary C, Thomas GE, Taylor A, Beard D, Carr A, Glyn-Jones S. Diagnosing and investigating adverse reactions in metal on metal hip implants. [Review]. BMJ. 2011:20111129.

Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B. Revision rates after total joint replacement: Cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B. 2011;93(3):293-7.

Administration. ADoHTG. Metal-on-metal hip replacement implants: Information for general practitioners, Orthopaedic surgeons and other health professionals 2015. Report. 2015.

Agency MaHPR. Metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements—Updated advice with patient follow ups 2012. . 2012.

Risks SCoENIH. Opinion on: The safety of metal-on-metal joint replacements with a particular focus on hip implants 2014.; 2014.

Rahman WA, Amenabar T, Hetaimish BM, Safir OA, Kuzyk PR, Gross AE. Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2016.

Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP, et al. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.[Erratum appears in J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Apr;93(4):566]. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - British Volume. 2011;93(2):164-71.

Lohmann CH, Schwartz Z Fau - Koster G, Koster G Fau - Jahn U, Jahn U Fau - Buchhorn GH, Buchhorn Gh Fau - MacDougall MJ, MacDougall Mj Fau - Casasola D, et al. Phagocytosis of wear debris by osteoblasts affects differentiation and local factor production in a manner dependent on particle composition. 2000(0142-9612 (Print)).

Greiner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Bedard NA, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Mahoney CR. Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at Five to Twelve Years Follow-Up: A Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(8):1773-8.

Van Der Veen HC, Reininga IHF, Zijlstra WP, Boomsma MF, Bulstra SK, Van Raay JJAM. Pseudotumour incidence, cobalt levels and clinical outcome after large head metal-onmetal and conventional metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: Mid-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Bone and Joint Journal. 2015;97B(11):1481-7.

Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Kamali A, Maggiani F, Glyn-Jones S, Gill HS, et al. The correlation of wear with histological features after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The Journal of bone and joint surgery American volume. 2013;95(12):e81.

Kwon YM, Jacobs JJ, MacDonald SJ, Potter HG, Fehring TK, Lombardi AV. Evidence-based understanding of management perils for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(8 Suppl):20-5.

Natu S, Sidaginamale RP, Gandhi J, Langton DJ, Nargol AV. Adverse reactions to metal debris: histopathological features of periprosthetic soft tissue reactions seen in association with failed metal on metal hip arthroplasties. Journal of clinical pathology. 2012;65(5):409-18.

Browne JA, Bechtold Cd Fau - Berry DJ, Berry Dj Fau - Hanssen AD, Hanssen Ad Fau - Lewallen DG, Lewallen DG. Failed metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: a spectrum of clinical presentations and operative findings. 2010(1528-1132 (Electronic)).

Barba T, Wach J, Lustig S, Laurent F, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Valour F, et al. Metallosis-associated prosthetic joint infection. Medecine et Maladies Infectieuses. 2015;45(11-12):484-7.

Quinn JR, Lee J, Schwarzkopf R. Inflammatory pseudotumor complicated by recurrent dislocations after revision total hip arthroplasty. Case reports in orthopedics. 2014;2014:792781.

Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2006;88(6):1183-91.

Chalmers BP, Perry KI, Taunton MJ, Mabry TM, Abdel MP. Diagnosis of adverse local tissue reactions following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2016;9(1):67-74.

Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Murray DW, Gill HS. The relationship between head-neck ratio and pseudotumour formation in metal-on-metal resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2010;92(11):1527-34.

Haughom BD, Erickson BJ, Hellman MD, Jacobs JJ. Do Complication Rates Differ by Gender After Metal-on-metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2015;473(8):2521-9.

Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. The Journal of bone and joint surgery British volume. 2009;91(12):1566-74.

Reito A, Lainiala O, Elo P, Eskelinen A. Prevalence of Failure due to Adverse Reaction to Metal Debris in Modern, Medium and Large Diameter Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements--The Effect of Novel Screening Methods: Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis. PloS one. 2016;11(3):e0147872.

Renner L, Schmidt-Braekling T, Faschingbauer M, Boettner F. Do cobalt and chromium levels predict osteolysis in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(12):1657-62.

Bayley N, Khan H, Grosso P, Hupel T, Stevens D, Snider M, et al. What are the predictors and prevalence of pseudotumor and elevated metal ions after large-diameter metal-on-metal THA? Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2015;473(2):477-84.

Ludgate S HF, Cacou C. . Medical Device Alert: All metalon-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. In: Agency UKMHpR, editor. 2012.

Garbuz DS, Hargreaves BA, Duncan CP, Masri BA, Wilson DR, Forster BB. The John Charnley Award: Diagnostic accuracy of MRI versus ultrasound for detecting pseudotumors in asymptomatic metal-on-metal THA. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2014;472(2):417-23.

Robinson E, Henckel J, Sabah S, Satchithananda K, Skinner J, Hart A. Cross-sectional imaging of metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties. Can we substitute MARS MRI with CT? Acta orthopaedica. 2014;85(6):577-84.

Berber R, Skinner JA, Hart AJ. Management of metal-on-metal hip implant patients: Who, when and how to revise? World journal of orthopedics. 2016;7(5):272-9.

Anwander H, Cron GO, Rakhra K, Beaule PE. Perfusion MRI in hips with metal-on-metal and metal-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty: A pilot study. Bone & joint research. 2016;5(3):73-9.

Morin Y, Daniel P. Quebec beer-drinkers' cardiomyopathy: etiological considerations. Canadian Medical Association journal. 1967;97(15):926-8.

Mosier BA, Maynard L, Sotereanos NG, Sewecke JJ. Progressive Cardiomyopathy in a Patient With Elevated Cobalt Ion Levels and Bilateral Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasties. American journal of orthopedics (Belle Mead, NJ). 2016;45(3):E132-5.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18103/imr.v3i7.492

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.