Angiogenesis and Breast Cancer: What next?

lida mina, George W. Sledge

Abstract


Angiogenesis remains a critical feature of tumor evolvement and metastasis. Therefore blocking angiogenesis is very appealing as a pathway to curing cancer. Since angiogenesis is a complex mechanism where pro and anti-angiogenesis factors compete, multiple possibilities have been postulated to interfere with this tumor-induced neovascularization process.

The most studied approach in the field of breast cancer so far has been the use of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against the most potent pro-angiogenic factor, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Bevacizumab has been shown to be active in several malignancies, in particular colo-rectal cancer and was launched in breast cancer in early as well as late stages. Other anti-angiogenic drugs like sorafenib, sunitinib and ramicurimab have also been extensively studied. The studies so far have had sobering results that did not match the early expectations from the preclinical setting.

Nearly 4 decades after Folkman first introduced neovascularization, interest in inhibition of angiogenesis in the breast cancer field seems to be fading away after several disappointing studies. In this review we summarize successes and challenges of anti-angiogenic therapy and highlight the pivotal clinical trials of anti-angiogenic drugs in the breast cancer field.

Keywords


Breast cancer; angiogenesis; VEGF

Full Text:

 Subscribers Only

References


Folkman, J., What is the evidence that tumors are angiogenesis dependent? J Natl Cancer Inst, 1990. 82(1): p. 4-6.

Folkman, J., Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis. N Engl J Med, 1995. 333(26): p. 1757-63.

Schneider, B.P. and K.D. Miller, Angiogenesis of breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005. 23(8): p. 1782-90.

Kristensen, T.B., et al., Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in breast cancer. Int J Mol Sci, 2014. 15(12): p. 23024-41.

Paez-Ribes, M., et al., Antiangiogenic therapy elicits malignant progression of tumors to increased local invasion and distant metastasis. Cancer Cell, 2009. 15(3): p. 220-31.

Sledge, G.W., Jr. and K.D. Miller, Angiogenesis and antiangiogenic therapy. Curr Probl Cancer, 2002. 26(1): p. 1-60.

Sledge, G.W., Jr., VEGF-targeting therapy for breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia, 2005. 10(4): p. 319-23.

Ghosh, S., et al., High levels of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors (VEGFR-1, VEGFR-2, neuropilin-1) are associated with worse outcome in breast cancer. Hum Pathol, 2008. 39(12): p. 1835-43.

Lee, J.C., et al., Prognostic value of vascular endothelial growth factor expression in colorectal cancer patients. Eur J Cancer, 2000. 36(6): p. 748-53.

Hlatky, L., et al., Mammary fibroblasts may influence breast tumor angiogenesis via hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulation and protein expression. Cancer Res, 1994. 54(23): p. 6083-6.

Miller, K.D., et al., Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2005. 23(4): p. 792-9.

Lau, D.H., et al., Paclitaxel (Taxol): an inhibitor of angiogenesis in a highly vascularized transgenic breast cancer. Cancer Biother Radiopharm, 1999. 14(1): p. 31-6.

Sweeney, C.J., et al., The antiangiogenic property of docetaxel is synergistic with a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor or 2-methoxyestradiol but antagonized by endothelial growth factors. Cancer Res, 2001. 61(8): p. 3369-72.

Miller, K., et al., Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2007. 357(26): p. 2666-76.

Robert, N.J., et al., RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(10): p. 1252-60.

Miles, D.W., et al., First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients. Ann Oncol, 2013. 24(11): p. 2773-80.

Burstein, H.J., et al., Phase II study of sunitinib malate, an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(11): p. 1810-6.

Bergh, J., et al., Clinical and pharmacokinetic study of sunitinib and docetaxel in women with advanced breast cancer. Breast, 2012. 21(4): p. 507-13.

Bergh, J., et al., First-line treatment of advanced breast cancer with sunitinib in combination with docetaxel versus docetaxel alone: results of a prospective, randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol, 2012. 30(9): p. 921-9.

Crown, J.P., et al., Phase III trial of sunitinib in combination with capecitabine versus capecitabine monotherapy for the treatment of patients with pretreated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(23): p. 2870-8.

Barrios, C.H., et al., Phase III randomized trial of sunitinib versus capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2010. 121(1): p. 121-31.

Allegra, C.J., et al., Bevacizumab in stage II-III colon cancer: 5-year update of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project C-08 trial. J Clin Oncol, 2013. 31(3): p. 359-64.

Fuchs, C.S., et al., Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): an international, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet, 2014. 383(9911): p. 31-9.

Mackey, J.R., et al., Primary results of ROSE/TRIO-12, a randomized placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the addition of ramucirumab to first-line docetaxel chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2015. 33(2): p. 141-8.

Cameron, D., et al., Adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative breast cancer (BEATRICE): primary results of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2013. 14(10): p. 933-42.

Bear, H.D., et al., Bevacizumab added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(4): p. 310-20.

von Minckwitz, G., et al., Survival after adding capecitabine and trastuzumab to neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy for primary breast cancer (GBG 40--GeparQuattro). Ann Oncol, 2014. 25(1): p. 81-9.

von Minckwitz, G., et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and bevacizumab for HER2-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 2012. 366(4): p. 299-309.

Sikov, W.M., et al., Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol, 2015. 33(1): p. 13-21.

Earl, H.M., et al., Efficacy of neoadjuvant bevacizumab added to docetaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, for women with HER2-negative early breast cancer (ARTemis): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(6): p. 656-66.

Bear, H.D., et al., Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant bevacizumab in early breast cancer (NSABP B-40 [NRG Oncology]): secondary outcomes of a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(9): p. 1037-48.

Schneider, B.P., et al., Association of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 genetic polymorphisms with outcome in a trial of paclitaxel compared with paclitaxel plus bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: ECOG 2100. J Clin Oncol, 2008. 26(28): p. 4672-8.

Schneider, B.P. and G.W. Sledge, Jr., Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for breast cancer: can we pick the winners? J Clin Oncol, 2011. 29(18): p. 2444-7.

Maru, D., A.P. Venook, and L.M. Ellis, Predictive biomarkers for bevacizumab: are we there yet? Clin Cancer Res, 2013. 19(11): p. 2824-7.

de Haas, S., et al., Genetic variability of VEGF pathway genes in six randomized phase III trials assessing the addition of bevacizumab to standard therapy. Angiogenesis, 2014. 17(4): p. 909-20.

Giuliano, S. and G. Pages, Mechanisms of resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapies. Biochimie, 2013. 95(6): p. 1110-9.

Kerbel, R.S., A cancer therapy resistant to resistance. Nature, 1997. 390(6658): p. 335-6.

Osada, T., et al., The effect of anti-VEGF therapy on immature myeloid cell and dendritic cells in cancer patients. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 2008. 57(8): p. 1115-24.

Jin, Y., et al., A novel function for programmed death ligand-1 regulation of angiogenesis. Am J Pathol, 2011. 178(4): p. 1922-9.

Voron, T., et al., Control of the immune response by pro-angiogenic factors. Front Oncol, 2014. 4: p. 70.

Zuniga, R.M., et al., Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan. J Neurooncol, 2009. 91(3): p. 329-36.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18103/imr.v3i4.358

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright 2016. All rights reserved.